Deforestation is a major contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions and, thereby, to climate change. ↩︎, Scharlemann, Jörn PW et al. ? 2015. We are confident in Cool Earth’s analysis of shielding areas, as the process used is to be regularly evaluated and involves extensive use of high-quality satellite imagery where available. To make a tax-efficient donation in GBP, visit charitywateruk.org. - Is the project being run by competent, experienced management? It is hence unclear whether Cool Earth’s counterfactual impact on the well being is as great as might initially be supposed. Environment and Health, Hamilton, Canada (2012). ? How You (Yes, You!)  With 1.77 billion acres of forest located in the countries where Cool Earth has been active, this equates to 0.12% of the total forest area either shielded or directly protected by Cool Earth. 2015. So far we've helped raise £13,623,639! Every international carbon standard requires a project to provide and prove measurements based on peer-approved scientific methodologies. 15 Apr. 12 Jan. 2016
↩︎, From our communications[l] with Cool Earth, 2016. Charity Navigator looks for at least 3 board members, with more than 50% of those members identified as independent. However, it is quite likely that they could use well over £2 million at the same level of cost-effectiveness. Given these factors, we estimate that Cool Earth reduces greenhouse gas emissions through direct protection of forests at a rate of $1.34 per tonne of CO2-equivalent. As a method of reducing carbon emissions, the IPCC recognises that reducing deforestation and managing forests sustainably are among the “…most cost-effective mitigation options…” for reducing emissions and estimates that it would cost achieve emission reductions at less than $20/tCO2eq. In 1970, the charityâs founders, Katharine and Harold Fisher established The Phobicsâ Society from their home in Chorlton, Manchester, as a direct result of Katharineâs personal experience of agoraphobia and with the sole aim of getting support in place for others in the same situation. ↩︎, "AR5 Synthesis Report - Climate Change 2014 - IPCC." It is also reassuring that Cool Earth’s model of sustainable agreements to reduce emissions has been endorsed by the author of the Stern Report and various other leading academics.. This compensation data is displayed exactly how it is reported to the IRS. The estimates of carbon dioxide stored per acre of forest which were listed above (averaging 272tCO2eq/acre) included only the above-ground stores. However, according to Cool Earth, most logging is not done by career loggers. Complete guide to survey questions with survey examples and sample survey questions that include question types, answer types and good questions for a survey like the Dichotomous Survey Question, Multiple Choice Question, Rank Order Scaling Question, Rating Scale Question, Semantic Differential Scale, Stapel Scale Question, Constant Sum Survey Questions and much more! Forest ecology and management 268 (2012): 6-17.  Although such mangrove forests account for less than 1% of the total area of the world’s tropical forests, they make up approximately 3% of the total carbon sequestration in tropical forests. Building 9,276 clean cookstoves in Honduras this year, reducing 27,828 metric tons of CO2. They have previously involved support for local industries such as cacao and coffee, technical assistance, funding for local schools, provision of boats for emergency health evacuations, and targeted maternal healthcare. ↩︎, From our communications[r] with Cool Earth, 2016. Unfortunately, however, we are unable to assess exactly how large an effect this is. Comparing Charities: How Big Is The Difference? For organizations larger than $1million in total revenue we expect to see that the charity completed an audit. Some elements of this website may not work correctly. Quantitative risk assessment of the effects of climate change on selected causes of death, 2030s and 2050s. Log in . During 2007-14, he headed the technical teams of a United Nations accredited Designated Operational Entity – SGS United Kingdom Ltd. Every project on Cool Effect’s platform is triple-verified, starting with a review and verification from one of the world’s major carbon standards—the Gold Standard, the Verified Carbon Standard, the Climate Action Reserve, the American Carbon Registry, or the United Nations’ Clean Development Mechanism. 2016 http://www.theguardian.com/environment/datablog/2009/sep/02/total-forest-area-by-country ↩︎, "AR5 Synthesis Report - Climate Change 2014 - IPCC." Biotropica 42.6 (2010): 739-747. If we include indirectly shielded forests, the lower central estimate drops to $97,300 per death prevented (with a higher estimate of $252,900 and lower bound of $32,700). Nonetheless, Cool Earth mitigates climate change more cost-effectively than any other charities working on direct mitigation which we are aware of at the moment, and we are confident that Cool Earth is one of the most-effective charities in this area. charity: water is a registered charity in the UK. In addition, their level of cost-effectiveness is highly impressive, given that the most similar experiment involved administrative costs of more than 50%, compared with Cool Earth’s 10%. 5 BLACK-OWNED BRANDS THAT SHOULD BE AT THE TOP OF YOUR HOLIDAY WISHLIST. It's powered by Yandex so you can trust our results. You could donate to a specific appeal â such as our most recent Coronavirus appeal â or you can give to our emergency fund which goes to where the need is greatest at that time.  Given this, Cool Earth does not simply reduce CO2-equivalent emissions by the 272 tonnes for every acre protected, but instead reduces the probability of logging of any given area of protected forest from 28% to 0.5%, which is equivalent to an emission reduction of roughly 74.8tCO2eq per acre (or a range of 53.4-115.4tCO2eq/acre).. But to run now might attract those beings that crave the pain of others. In addition to this, Cool Earth is working to make more data available to the communities with which they work. From our communications with Cool Earth, it appears that the use of such volunteers is fairly minimal and restricted to administrative and research work in the UK. RCT3 is a way to experience your favorite theme parks anytime you feel creative! ? This Beta V2 of the Finance & Accountability Score provides a baseline measure of an organization’s health including the indicators listed in the report below. climate change mitigation through direct action; preventing deforestation; community-based economic empowerment; Emissions of CO2 contribute to anthropogenic climate change which, in turn, has extensive negative impacts on human health and wellbeing. This does not indicate a positive or negative assessment, only that we have not reached a conclusion for one of the following reasons: The nonprofit is eligible for a score, but we have not yet gotten to scoring it. We also track accountability and transparency policies to ensure the good governance and integrity of the organization. Maybe from something undefined that fueled her energy. However, Cool Earth aims to improve upon this in the coming year. Cool effect educates the public on the effects of climate change and solicits donations to support carbon reduction projects, empowering individuals and businesses to take action in the fight against climate change. Planting mangrove trees in Myanmar to stabilize the coastline, reduce erosion, protect from storms, and provide a home for fish, birds, and plants. There are office storage boxes that are great for all those loose bits of paper and other key documents as well as desk organisers that'll help â¦ In addition, the number of communities located in shielded areas is relatively low. Most shielded communities lie within the same geographical area as the protected communities or are, in some way, related to those communities. ↩︎, Alongi, Daniel M. "Carbon sequestration in mangrove forests." Although there have not been any external randomised controlled trials of the impacts of Cool Earth’s work on emissions and on human welfare, there is a considerable body of evidence supporting the nature of their interventions. Make sure it's a legitimate, reputable charity. They have also conducted diet and nutrition surveys in partner communities in Peru and, as a result, have identified malnutrition (particularly anemia) and sanitation as major underlying health issues within these communities.. Charity Navigator evaluates a nonprofit organization’s financial health including measures of stability, efficiency and sustainability. Classyâs online fundraising platform gives nonprofits easy, effective, and customizable solutions to manage your fundraising efforts. No rating yet (PC) Download. Cool Effect Inc. reported its two largest programs on its FY 2019 Form 990 as: Cool effects mission is to reduce carbon emissions by supporting projects across the globe that reduce CO2. With a regular gift, you can make a difference all year round. By Molly St. Louis, Creative executive @MollStLouis. ? "Conventional tree height–diameter relationships significantly overestimate aboveground carbon stocks in the Central Congo Basin." Check out these 5 awesome Black-owned brands that are supporting (RED)âs fight against pandemics this holiday season. 2015. In addition, their work is likely to be highly effective in preserving rainforests, as this is what they do most directly, and may also be effective in providing economic empowerment and health benefits to the local communities with which they establish partnerships. 15 Apr. 2010. Use the Give as you â¦ IRS Forms 990 are provided courtesy of Foundation Center. If indirectly shielded forest is also included, this drops to $0.38 per tonne of CO2-equivalent. There is also a degree of uncertainty in the amount of CO2 stored in above-ground biomass. With news on COVID-19 happening rapidly, weâve created this page to bring you our latest stories and information on the outbreak in and around â¦ Regarding the satellite data used to evaluate canopy loss and terrain, Cool Earth purchases this from a variety of sources and evaluates it internally (with support from Exeter University when required). Unfocused and uncontrollable energy that had to come out. The majority of these areas in existing projects are uninhabited and would, as a result, be at particular risk of logging. This is quite concerning, as it may mean that, counterfactually, Cool Earth’s work results in fewer economic benefits for the wider population than would otherwise be obtained. ↩︎, "ClimateCare." Someone had to focus Meg before something went terribly wrong. "Understanding REDD+ with Actor-Centered Power approach: A review." This score represents Form 990 data from latest filing year 2019.  Excluded are those areas which would very likely not be logged even without nearby partnerships in place, due to the same obstructive physical characteristics. The funding provided by Cool Earth to those communities with which it establishes agreements, and the resulting benefits, will most likely exceed the compensation which they would otherwise receive from logging.  This level of cost-effectiveness is due to the large amounts of carbon dioxide which are trapped in forest biomass which are released when logging occurs - approximately 272 tonnes per acre.. 2.55 is likely somewhat high, as one of the two major ongoing projects has achieved a far lower ratio, and can hence be considered fairly generous (for this reason, we have specifically included the figures for direct protection in this evaluation and elsewhere). These make up roughly 10% of overall spending and are already factored into our estimates. From paper clips to staplers and paperwork to invoices, keep your office tidy and clutter-free with our handy office organisers. Due to this proximity, they still experience many of the economic benefits of the protected communities. GuideStar has recognized this organization with a Gold Seal of Transparency for voluntarily and publicly describing their goals, strategies, and accomplishments.